MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process.
Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects.
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”

Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”, This news data comes from:http://bd-fhav-eyq-hjdl.ycyzqzxyh.com
- Planning via ‘gender lens’ to make cities more inclusive — expert
- Got the scoop: Bear takes over California ice cream shop
- Make a difference, write your own future, youth urged
- Marcos declares holidays for 2026
- Surfacing of WPS features ‘likely’ natural occurrence, not due to dumped crushed corals
- 500 Internal Server Error
- Bersamin letter proves Torre reassignments ‘valid’
- Ukraine eyes defense deal with PH that includes co-production of drones, says envoy
- Japanese volunteers to PH 'bedrock' of bilateral relations, says envoy
- PNP chief supports lowering age of discernment